Cricket: False Populism and Imposed Nationalism


Kshirod Nag

kshirodIt certainly gives pleasure to see symbols as inspiring tools to motivate the generations to come. Contextually, we can take a look at the initiative taken by the state to confer the 'Bharat Ratna' on Sachin Tendulkar as one such symbol. It was felt necessary to honour a person who, undoubtedly, captured the minds of millions, who became a 'Hero' for the 'nation', a true epitome of national imagination. This is the very 'Nationalism' which binds people together and brings pride, and this is why, we feel proud to be Indians. Why not Bharat Ratna for Sachin Tendulkar, as he gets support across society. He has attained this populism by serving the purpose of nationalism so well.

However, for a moment, let's think over all the above-mentioned terms namely; nation, nationalism, inspiration, populism, service and so on. What are these terms all about? Are these represented through collective conscience/imagination or merely imposed, manufactured and socially-constructed metaphors of a few shrewd minds? To put it differently, did Sachin play for the 'nation'? Even if he did, was he the only sportsperson to have brought glory to the nation?

BCCI (for whom Sachin played) has been claiming before the Supreme Court that it is not at all public and is a completely private body registered under Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act. It is not amenable to rules and regulations framed by the Government of India (Supreme Court's Direction,  2005). Therefore, the changes made by the BCCI in the rules of selection process, format of game, choosing of venues, collection of huge money through matches can never be questioned by general public in a court of law. In 2005, in the Zee Telefilms judgement, the Supreme court noted the BCCI's stand: "It is a private organization whose objects are to promote the game of cricket. Its functions are regulated and governed by its own rules and regulations independent of any statute and are only related to its members" (Cited in Times of India, 18th Nov, 2013). Why does BCCI have this firm stand? Is it only to escape public scrutiny regarding its management process?

sachin-tendulkar 1

Surprisingly, people still associate cricket with the nation instead of associating it with the corporates (market economy) which are unashamedly backed by influential politicians and industrialists. Apart from this, what about the other sport personalities (some names- Dhyan Chand, P.T. Usha and others) who represented the so-called 'nation' in the international scenario? It is not only about whom to honour and whom not to, but also about politics of recognition and mis-recognition of greatness, which is cleverly framed by the ruling-dominant ideas. These dominant ideas are characterised by different social realities, namely caste, class, gender, region, religion and so on. The above-mentioned sport persons were sidelined because of their inability to cope up with these very ideas and specifically, there is no element of market economy working for these other sportpersons to grasp the so-called national imagination. Therefore, they have failed to fulfil the criteria of 'populism'.

In colonial and post-colonial India, there is a history of creating false-nationhood by perpetuating the dominant ideology in the name of collective imagination. In the process, many nationalist leaders have come out with mythical symbols to impose the idea of nation; for example- Gandhi's conception of Ram Rajya, which still has a powerful impact on the people. As long as someone conforms to this notion, s/he is considered as a nationalist, otherwise s/he is treated as a traitor or anti-national and therefore, Ambedkar had to suffer, when he raised the issue of untouchability and demanded separate electorates for the untouchables. Fortunately, Sachin Tendulkar need not suffer like Ambedkar as he is conforming to the idea of nation and nationalism.

Next in the line - Amitabh Bachchan, Shahrukh Khan, Ranbir Kapoor, Salman Khan and others. Because these celebrities have the largest fan following in the 'nation', despite the fact that they all are torch-bearers of the ruling ideology. They all fulfill the criteria of populism/nationalism.



Kshirod says:

I am a Ph.D student of Social Science doing research on 'Democracy and Dalit Leadership'. I am associated with UDSF, JNU, since 2010 and engaged in many other activities related to Ambedkar's philosophy. I am from Odisha.

Other Related Articles

India and its contradictions
Sunday, 20 August 2017
  Raju Chalwadi This August 15th marked the completion of 70 years of Independence. The preamble of the constitution way back in 1950 defined India as a place where Justice, Liberty, Equality... Read More...
Bahujans and Brahmins: Why their realities shall always collide, not converge
Wednesday, 16 August 2017
  Kuffir My grandfather,The starvation deathWhich occurred during the drought when men were sold;My father,The migrant lifeWhich left home in search of work to pay off debt;I, in ragged shirt... Read More...
Why Not Janeu Under My Kurta?
Wednesday, 09 August 2017
  Rahmath EP Lipstick Under My Burkha is a ‘by the Brahmin for the Brahmin' movie to propagate the Savarna definition of the ‘oppressed women’. The whole movie gives you a clear picture of... Read More...
Communalism and the Pasmanda question
Wednesday, 09 August 2017
  Lenin Maududi It's time for us to understand that politics is at the centre of every society. It follows then that if politics is of a poor quality, it is futile to expect any improvement in... Read More...
Why Buddhism?
Monday, 07 August 2017
  Dr. R. Praveen The growing atrocities on dalits in the name of hindutva fascism need to be countered with a formidable retaliation, one which leads us to path of progression and helps us to... Read More...

Recent Popular Articles

I Will Not Exit Your House Without Letting You Know That I am a Dalit
Thursday, 02 March 2017
  Riya Singh Yes, I am assertive. Assertive of my caste identity. It is not a 'fashion statement' trust me, it takes a lot of courage and training of your own self to be this assertive. You... Read More...
Kishori Amonkar: Assertion, Erasure, Reclamation
Wednesday, 12 April 2017
   Rohan Arthur Hindustani vocalist Kishori Amonkar passed away on 3rd April, 2017. Kishori Amonkar is remembered for her contribution to Hindustani classical music, and her passing was... Read More...
Interview with Prof Khalid Anis Ansari on the Pasmanda Movement
Monday, 27 February 2017
  Round Table India In this episode of the Ambedkar Age series, Round Table India talks to Prof. Khalid Anis Ansari, Director, Dr. Ambedkar Centre for Exclusion Studies & Transformative... Read More...
Archiving the Complex Genealogies of Caste and Sexuality: An Interview with Dr. Anjali Arondekar
Saturday, 10 June 2017
  Anjali Arondekar This interview emerged as a series of email exchanges between Rohan Arthur and Dr. Anjali Arondekar who works on the Gomantak Maratha Samaj archives, following Rohan's... Read More...
Gandhi's Caste and Guha's Upper Caste Identity Politics
Tuesday, 13 June 2017
  Nidhin Shobhana In today's editorial page of Indian Express, Ramachandra Guha has written an essay by the title 'Does Gandhi have a Caste?'[1] In the essay, Guha tries really hard to establish... Read More...