Narikkoravar’s constitutional struggle for dignity and representation

 

NDMJ-NCDHR

It has been four and a half decades since the Narikoravan (a) Kuruvikaran community has been waging a constitutional struggle for Scheduled Tribe status.

Narikoravan is a nomadic tribe involved in the making of 'rudrasksha malai' and other such long chains, rosary beads which have been historically part of temple economies. Their products find great demand among pilgrims who travel to Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple in Pathanamthita, Kerala. Narikuravars are also itinerant sellers of plastic vessels and other daily utilities. Their population is not more than 30,000 in Tamil Nadu. They have no representation in any decision-making bodies. Presently, they are listed under Most Backward Classes in Tamil Nadu and among Other Backward Classes in the Central Government List.

narikkuravar

 For Narikuravars, it has been almost impossible to transcend their traditional occupation. Several first generation learners go back to their traditional occupation due to lack of facilities and difficulties embedded in claiming and furnishing their MBC/OBC status. The first generation learners from the community who are leading the movement articulate their demand in terms of better and meaningful access to modern facilities and educational infrastructure.

In 1965, the Lokur Committee1 recommended inclusion of Narikoravans (Kuruvikaran) in the list of Scheduled Tribes. The mandate of the 1965 committee was to examine the 'historical and scientific background' of tribes and caste groups to evaluate their social, economic and educational conditions. Clearly, the recommendation of the Committee was not implemented in the case of Narikuravars. The report points out that Narikorvans are a 'very backward tribe' with distinct customs.

Minister Letter

In the 1980s, M.G. Ramachandran, the then Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu proposed to the Union Government to include Narikuravars in the ST list.

On 18th December 2013, the UPA government was forced to issue a bill2 (160/2013) to include the community in the ST list.

Lok Sabha Business

Prior to the issuance of this bill, Narikuravars convinced DMK president Karunanidhi and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalitha to write to the Central government.However, on 21st February 2014 when the bill was floored in the Lok Sabha none of the members supported the Bill. This led to its lapse.

Another letter

The community demanded the passage of the bill in the winter session of the Lok Sabha. Nearly 50 Narikuravar women, children and men, under the banner of Tamil Nadu Narikoravan (A) Kuruvikaran Welfare Federation (TNKWF), travelled to Delhi all the way from Tamil Nadu. For over two weeks (starting from the first week of December 2015) they lived in tiny lodge in Paharganj area of New Delhi to meet MPs and Union Ministers.They also staged a hunger strike on 4th December 2015 at Jantar Mantar. The Union government ensured that the bill would be enacted, without any delay.

 Narikkuravar2

After several rounds of dialogue with members of parliament and ministers; on 9th December 2015, Pon. Radhakrishnan, Minister of State for Road Transports, Highways and Shipping, Government of India, wrote a letter to Jual Oram, Minister of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, strongly recommending Narikuravar's case for ST status. In the letter, the Minister points out that Narikuravar Community is 'nomadic, extremely poor and one of the most vulnerable communities' in Tamil Nadu. More than 87% of this population is non-literate. The minister further states that the number of graduates in the community is hardly '0.02%' of the total population. It is in such a context that they demand ST status with the hope to improve their living conditions and representations.

handbill

However, the winter session of the Parliament failed to pass the Bill. The struggle of the community is still on. There is a need for greater awareness and support from civil society actors to ensure the passage of the Bill in the next session of the Parliament.

Narikkuravar5

~

Notes

[1]. While the definition of 'tribe' remains contested, the broad criterion for determining whether a community is 'tribal or not' as per the Lokur Committee Report are - spatial organization (separate and excluded existence), distinctive culture, 'primitive' traits, shyness of contact with community at large and socio-economic and educational backwardness.

[2]. The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order (Second Amendment) Bill, 2013.

~~~

Other Related Articles

Dalit Women in Higher Education in Odisha
Wednesday, 03 June 2020
  Saraswati Suna "I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress which women have achieved." ~ Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Education is a path for equal opportunity and ensures... Read More...
Migrant Tears in Untouchable India
Sunday, 31 May 2020
Mungamuri Kranthi Kumar Corona doesn’t know any Caste or Religion, Says Hindutva. It is a blatant lie, It is Brahminical Morality Mocking thousand of years of Bahujan pain and agony. Caste Hindus... Read More...
Necessity of representation: a Tribal woman vice chancellor in India
Sunday, 31 May 2020
Swapnil Dhanraj When was the last time India celebrated a success story of a woman coming from a Tribal community in Indian academia? If we think about the manner in which Indian education system has... Read More...
Feminism is Brahminism
Saturday, 30 May 2020
Anu Ramdas This is the transcript of a preliminary talk on the topic of feminism is brahminism. First, thank you. It is so lovely to see all of you. Thank you for the opportunity. And I am not at all... Read More...
Modi, BJP, Sangh Parivar and gang spell callousness
Thursday, 28 May 2020
  Sundeep Pattem (SAVARI and Round Table India are doing a series to put together the Bahujan perspective on the Coronavirus pandemic) [The conversation was recorded on April 12, 2020] Anu... Read More...

Recent Popular Articles

Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), and the Tribal Community (Adivasi)
Wednesday, 18 December 2019
  Jawar Bheel Students' protests have rocked the country since the passage of Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB). CAB has already become Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Also, on November 20th,... Read More...
Reading India in the time of protest!
Saturday, 28 December 2019
  Thongam Bipin Time and again we have seen how India unfolds itself to its margin during protests. It is violent and oppressive. It has made itself clear through its actions that the state... Read More...
The unsure stage of Indian democracy...
Saturday, 28 December 2019
  Shiva Thorat It was around the time that the Constitution of India was delivered to Rajendra Prasad: after Gandhi's assassination by Godse and in response, the former home minister Sardar... Read More...
The legacy of B. R. Ambedkar and his contribution to social justice and equality
Thursday, 19 December 2019
  Kavita Chohan There is a false perception among Indians that Dr. Ambedkar's work addresses the concerns of Dalits and Dalit women only. This perception is not only found among those from... Read More...
Why Dr. Devi Shetty’s 25 (or 2500) ‘ways to manage Covid-19’ should be rejected outright
Tuesday, 07 April 2020
  Dr. Sylvia Karpagam For far too long, Dr. Devi Shetty has been giving advice on a range of things, the most recent being the Covid-19 pandemic. This is a crucial public health period for... Read More...