Caste and Maududian antagonism: Thinking Muslim theo-politics


Muhammed Shah (Shan)

shan muhammedIf one reads Usthad Abul A'ala Maududi as an early new historicist of Islam, we can't find enough reasons to dismiss his arguments. Perhaps the new historicist elements which to some extent are inherent to the Maududian understanding of Islamic historical moments, have created an aura of mysterious controversy around the figure of Maududi within the Muslim community. For example, in criticizing the emergence of monarchy, formation of 'sects', and 'divisions' in the history of Islamic governmentality, he practices an approach which is largely concerned with the historical material context, to determine a religious event. As Islamic religious events are traditionally understood from quite a meta-historical perspective, his approach has remained widely unaccepted in the Muslim community.

A Marxist should not have a problem with the new historicist way of understanding religious events, as religion and culture are byproducts of the material evolution of humankind in the Marxist perspective. Also, Usthad Maududi is known for framing the idea of being Muslim as being a rational believer, than being a mere heir of religion. Especially his critical analysis of Khulafaurashida (first four rulers of Islam) somewhat resembles the method of Patricia Crone who studied the history of governmentality in Islam from a modern perspective of statehood, although their critical locations are different. This has triggered a lot of debates among the Muslim community on many aspects. But my concern here is as to why Maududi is still a spectral presence across Indian campuses, suspending this particular irony whenever the caste question is raised from a Muslim political location.

Contemporary Muslim student politics, which is largely engaged by Islamists, traditionalists and Salafis has been keen in keeping an ethical dimension in its understanding of caste. In other words, ethics is a spiritual question for a Muslim subject. Muslim ethical discontent with caste is not that of mere solidarity or illegality but can only be that of pure theological conviction which transcends the limits of the political. Precisely because it provides a possibility to deconstruct the very self, it even has the radical potential for the annihilation of the remnants of caste practices among Muslim converts. I would like to call it 'Muslim theo-politics'. Having a metaphysical origin, caste is something that immensely precludes the process of 'becoming' an Indian subject. In order to overcome this stagnation of a subject, one has to imagine a counter metaphysics which is very much present in Muslim theo-politics. This is at odds with much of the contemporary anti-caste discourses, since its emancipatory aspects are very much outside Indian modernity.

Most of the anti-caste criticism about 'secularism' is primarily concerned with the question of 'secular' rather than 'secularism' as a political philosophy. It frames its critique of hegemonic forms of secularism and the restructuring of the same. Even though the 'secular' is a hegemonic entity, the Muslim problem thereof is more concerned with the political philosophy behind it. The same is applicable in the case of state as well. In that sense, the Muslim problem stems from its philosophical discontent with modern political values which have been largely employed in contemporary anti-caste movements. More importantly,an anti-caste Muslim is fundamentally and predominantly an ethical subject than a solely political one, and whose language and discourse find their origin in religion. In other words, an anti-caste Muslim must be a religious fundamentalist/conservative than 'progressive' and 'secular', and the radical sociality against 'caste/anti-caste sociality' is extremely explicit in his/her/their religion for a Muslim.

Hence, ethical sociality of the Muslim subject is not the same as anti-caste secularism of contemporary Bahujan politics. This anti-caste secularism is extremely inconclusive to the critique of political philosophy (of Secularism, state) which is inherent in the Muslim question and politics. Consequently, contemporary Bahujan politics, even as it is critical of the hegemony of the modern political philosophy, is still immanent in the same. In that sense, it has become almost impossible to imagine a transcendence from the Oedipal collaboration of modernity and caste society.

On the other hand, Usthad Sayyid Maududi interestingly develops an antagonistic, outside form of modern political philosophy from a theological perspective. In that sense, Maududi is immensely problematic for the left, right and even the Ambedkarites. In the same way, he is thereby, for everyone, a strong proponent of 'Islamic supremacy'. His understanding of secularism, democracy and nationalism is not entangled with the contemporary political critique of hegemony. Rather, it has a deep underpinning of philosophical critique which is derived from theology, thereby creating a potential for imagining a radical sociality which is entirely outside the caste relations subsumed in Indian modernity. So an ideal Islamic engagement with contemporary modern politics by participating in the anti-caste critique, does not at all imagine a reconstruction of sociality (which is anti-caste) but its total abolition altogether. However, this is not purely a Maududian movement, but such abolitionist tendencies can be seen throughout the movements of Islamic theo-politics. One of them was what might be the first recorded slave revolt in universal history. In 'Zanj' (Iraq), over a period of 15 years, half a million slaves, peasants and workers organized themselves and seized a significant region of the Iraqi empire and overthrew the existing Caliphate under the leadership of Ali Ibnu Muhammed, with the banner that "There can be no masters but only Allah". Eventually they established a new Caliphate. Events during the Mappila riots in 19th-20th centuries have been shaped by this abolitionist nature, which eventually made the caste locations of later converted Muslims radically imperceptible. Cheroor is one of the riots during which several members of the Pulaya community converted to Islam and took revenge against upper caste landlords and exiled them to Travancore.

These moments of transcendence and anti-determinism in fact constitute the 'radical inside' of Islamic sociality. Here, Susan Buck-Morss appears insightful in another way as she finds Islamism as a critique of the form of modernity. Interestingly her work entirely draws directly from Qutb, Gannouchi, Shariati, Taha etc., instead of Agamben, Zizek, Derrida or Habermas, in order to articulate the critical value of Islamism in the modern political context. As there are plenty of attempts being carried out in order to unveil the potential of Muslim theo-politics, drawing a simple parallel between Muslim politics and right wing Hindu politics, Maududi and Savarkar, is nothing short of a Hindu reluctance to acknowledge the imagination of another radical sociality in the caste context.

Instead of sharing the left, right rhetoric against Maududi, thinking about caste/hegemony from a zone of ethical and theoretical antagonism which was already made possible by Maududi as well as other Islamic thinkers needs to be reinitiated today, and not foreclosed.



Muhammed Shah (Shan) is pursuing his M.Phil in comparative literature, University of Hyderabad, who is closely engaging with Dalit-Bahujan discourse trying to think about caste question from an ethical-religious location. He can be reached at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


Other Related Articles

'Indian education doesn't have any emancipatory agenda': Prof Vivek Kumar
Monday, 11 September 2017
   Round Table India This is the transcription of Round Table India's interaction with Prof Vivek Kumar, Professor, Centre for the Study of Social Systems, School of Social Sciences,... Read More...
Election Manifesto 2017-18 of BAPSA
Wednesday, 06 September 2017
  BAPSA, JNU The JNU student community is about to elect a student body to represent them. The election is not just about choosing a representative. It is about the right response to a farce... Read More...
An open letter to Hon’ble Minister Mr. Ramdas Athawale
Monday, 28 August 2017
  Raju Chalwadi This letter has been written in keeping with the philosophy that critical self-evaluation and accountability of the movement and leaders itself is necessary and a pre-condition... Read More...
Toilet: Ek Prem Katha - Women's Liberation through the Manusmriti?
Sunday, 20 August 2017
  Obed Manwatkar Toilet: Ek Prem Katha is a movie produced by Reliance Entertainment owned by Mr. Ambani, one of the main corporate sponsors of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The theme of the... Read More...
"Don’t guide us, we know what to speak": The Dalit women of Kabirnagar
Monday, 14 August 2017
  Pradnya Jadhav I had been waiting for a long time to meet Jamanabai and her daughter Sangita, and today I was going to meet them. Almost everyone who I have met in the past few days regarding... Read More...

Recent Popular Articles

Saffronisation of Ambedkar and the need for resistance
Tuesday, 18 April 2017
  Tejaswini Tabhane When Ambedkar asked us to 'fight against Hindu Raj' he was not aware that one day the same propagandists of Hindu Raj will start (mis)appropriating his ideals. The fashion of... Read More...
Hindu nationalism and Muslim nationalism co-produce each other: Khalid Anis Ansari
Monday, 24 April 2017
  Round Table India In this episode of the Ambedkar Age series, Round Table India talks to Prof. Khalid Anis Ansari, Director, Dr. Ambedkar Centre for Exclusion Studies & Transformative... Read More...
Caste, Shambuka and Marginalized Reinterpretations of The Ramayana
Monday, 05 June 2017
  Emma Leiken  A tapasvi is to be venerated, whoever it may be. ~ Kuvempu, (Shudra Tapasvi) For many staunch devotees of Rama within the Hindu tradition, the Shambuka incident within The... Read More...
The revolution is a tea party for the Indian left
Friday, 05 May 2017
  Kuffir Sitaram Yechury's concerns have been consistently strange: do the communists in India really stand for the working classes? Who do they stand for, which class do they represent exactly?... Read More...
The Betrayal of Ambedkar and Dalits
Friday, 14 April 2017
  Raju Chalwadi There has been a race among the ruling class and especially among the ruling political class to project itself as true Ambedkarites or Ambedkar Bhakts, but will it dare to follow... Read More...