Chamcha Leadership or Conscious Leadership?

 

Rajanikanta Gochhayat

rajanikanta gochhayatRepresentation simply means acting and representing opinion/interest on behalf of the people. In the Indian context, Representation is divided into two categories: one, leadership from a reserved constituency and two, leadership from an unreserved constituency. Here, we would like to discuss the leadership emerging from the reserved constituencies by applying two models of Representation: trustee model and delegate model.

Dalit leaders seem to be a failure from the perspective of both these models. A trustee is a person who acts on behalf of others, using his/her superior knowledge, better education or greater experience, but Dalit leaders hardly use their own experience or learning. If we look at the Dalit leadership in terms of delegate model, Dalit leaders seldom represent the voice of their constituents in the decision-making process. Leaders as delegates, since they belong to reserved constituencies, are bound to have a frequent exchange of voice with their constituents and articulate their demands to be manifest in the policy. We are also ready to recognize the conscience of our leaders who should rationally use it in discussion and debate in the legislature.

Instead of using conscience and representing the issues of the constituents, Dalit leaders are going against Babasaheb Ambedkar who warned them not to be the repository of the malignant power sponsored by the Brahmin and Bania leadership. Misusing their political power without any sense of responsibility, they bargain with upper caste voters and remain accountable to them.

Babasaheb also emphasized on the normative aspect of power in a society, which indicates the values involved in the exercise of power. Let us examine the Dalit leadership keeping in views the words of Babasaheb and the models of Representation. Laxmipeta village falls under the Rajam constituency (Andhra Pradesh) which is reserved for the Scheduled Castes. Dalit leader of Rajam constituency was an obliged partner of the dominant communities of the district and hence didn't help the Dalits before the massacre, because he didn't want to incur the wrath of the dominant community, even though the issue was in favor of Dalit victims.

On the other hand, the dominant community used their malignant political power in favor of their community interest, though it was not genuine interest. One thing seems to be clear that Dalit leaders take Dalit votes for granted in the reserved constituency. They want to bargain with Non-SC voters and remain accountable to only them. But the leadership emerging from the consciousness formed on the basis of words left by our ancestors like Jotiba Phule, Birsa Munda and Babasaheb Ambedkar works for the betterment of the people in general and Dalit-Bahujan in particular.

Behen Mayawati is ahead as a leader of the masses who had brought about structural changes that engendered a qualitative improvement in the lives of Dalits, having come to power in UP. During her regime, she distributed 52,379 acres of land to the Dalit and most backward landless people in a special drive. Further, about 1, 52,000 got possession of land in which 1, 20,000 acres of land was distributed. About 20,000 more Dalits benefited when 15,000 irregular-land nominations were regularized in their names. Under Ambedkar village scheme, she provided Drinking Water, Electricity, Housing, School, Primary Health Centre, toilets in the village selected on the basis of the concentration of Dalit population.

Through these policies, she not only brought about changes in the lives of Dalit but also put an end to the dependency of Dalit for such service on Upper Castes. Looking at the leadership of Mayawati, Dalits in UP became conscious of their self-respect and rights. Which manifested in how the Dalits were able to force the landlords to increase their wages with the help of the police and sometimes they retaliated in whatever manner they could.

From the above discussion, Behenji (the title was given to Mayavati by the community) seems to have used her conscience and values in her execution of power the way Babasaheb envisaged. Finally, Dalit leaders who are a repository of humiliation in the form of not being able to use their conscience and values should give up politics. We need leaders who are able to arouse a sense of self-respect and consciousness.

Jai Bhim, Jai Birsa, Jai Phule!

~

References

 Tharakam, B (2012):"Laximpeta: Deadly Combination of Caste and Political Power", Economic and Political Weekly.vol no- 47
Kumar, Vivek (2003): "Politics of change", Economic and Political Weekly, vol no38, issue no.37,sept 13.
Guru, Gopal (2007): "Concept of political power", in edited book 'Ambedkar in retrospect', Rawat Publications

~~~

 

Rajanikanta Gochhayat is a Ph.D Scholar in Indian Institute Of Dalit Studies, New Delhi.

Other Related Articles

Mahatma Phule's Thoughts on Caste-Patriarchy: A Critical Evaluation
Thursday, 16 November 2017
  Sachin Garud It is a well-known fact that at the time of India's national movement, there was another movement known as the movement of social engineering or social revolution, led by Mahatma... Read More...
Becoming Minority- An Unsettling Inquiry into a ‘Settled’ Concept
Wednesday, 15 November 2017
  Bhakti Deodhar (Book review of Becoming minority: How Discourses and Policies Produce minorities in Europe and India, edited by Jyotirmay Tripathi and Sudarshan Padmanabhan, New Delhi, Sage... Read More...
Speech and the Speaker's Identity
Monday, 13 November 2017
  Tejas Harad In 2016, famous Indian author Chetan Bhagat published a novel called One Indian Girl. This book was criticised by some women because the book's narrator, who is also its... Read More...
Surveillance and Punishment in the Village: Reflections on Imayam’s Pethavan
Thursday, 09 November 2017
  Karthick RM "Hence the major effect of the Panopticon: to induce in the inmate a state of conscious and permanent visibility that assures the automatic functioning of power."-Michel Foucault... Read More...
Chamcha Leadership or Conscious Leadership?
Wednesday, 01 November 2017
  Rajanikanta Gochhayat Representation simply means acting and representing opinion/interest on behalf of the people. In the Indian context, Representation is divided into two categories: one,... Read More...

Recent Popular Articles

No Mr. Tharoor, I Don’t Want to Enter Your Kitchen
Saturday, 16 September 2017
Tejaswini Tabhane Shashi Tharoor is an author, politician and former international civil servant who is also a Member of Parliament representing the constituency of Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. This... Read More...
Gandhi's Caste and Guha's Upper Caste Identity Politics
Tuesday, 13 June 2017
  Nidhin Shobhana In today's editorial page of Indian Express, Ramachandra Guha has written an essay by the title 'Does Gandhi have a Caste?'[1] In the essay, Guha tries really hard to establish... Read More...
Archiving the Complex Genealogies of Caste and Sexuality: An Interview with Dr. Anjali Arondekar
Saturday, 10 June 2017
  Anjali Arondekar This interview emerged as a series of email exchanges between Rohan Arthur and Dr. Anjali Arondekar who works on the Gomantak Maratha Samaj archives, following Rohan's... Read More...
Bahujans and Brahmins: Why their realities shall always collide, not converge
Wednesday, 16 August 2017
  Kuffir My grandfather,The starvation deathWhich occurred during the drought when men were sold;My father,The migrant lifeWhich left home in search of work to pay off debt;I, in ragged shirt... Read More...
'Perspectives’: Social Experiment or Caste Conservation?
Saturday, 03 June 2017
  Kanika Sori  In February this year, a young Savarna woman from Srishti School of Art Design and Technology, Bangalore, created a photo-project that went viral. It was hosted by fifty... Read More...